Skip to main content

Table 4 The agreement or sensitivity for referral codes or text versus discharge diagnoses

From: Agreement between referral information and discharge diagnoses according to Norwegian elective treatment guidelines - a cross-sectional study

Definitions of agreement or lack of agreementa

Hospital

 

Haukeland No. (%)

UNNaNo. (%)

St Olav No. (%)

AHUSaNo. (%)

Total No. (%)

1. Clear agreement between referral and discharge

335 (74.4)

386 (83.9)

425 (89.5)

415 (88.5)

1561 (84.2)

2. Poorly formulated referral; some modification by the hospital

48 (10.7)

19 (4.1)

3 (0.6)

15 (3.3)

85 (4.6)

3. Not sufficiently specific but adequate

14 (3.1)

38 (8.3)

25 (5.3)

0 (0)

77 (4.2)

Good agreement: sum of codes 1-3

397 (88.2)

443 (96.3)

453 (95.4)

430 (91.7

1723 (92.9)

4. No agreement

53 (11.8)

17 (3.7)

22 (4.6)

39 (8.3)

131 (7.1)

Total number of records assessed

450 (100)

460 (100)

475 (100)

469 (100)

1854 (100)

Sensitivitya

0.88

0.96

0.95

0.92

0.93

95% confidence interval

0.87-0.90

0.94-0.98

0.91-0.99

0.90-0.94

0.92-0.94

  1. aThe codes 1-3 are valid diagnoses and code 4 is a non-valid diagnosis.
  2. Range of values: 0-1.00; study period 2008-9. X 2 tests overall 2008, 2009, 2008-9, and between hospitals 2008-9 - all p <0.01.
  3. AHUS, Akershus University Hospital; UNN, University Hospital of North Norway in Troms’.