This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Patient perspectives on having multiple versus single prescribers of chronic disease medications: results of a qualitative study in a veteran population
© Voils et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 14 April 2014
Accepted: 6 October 2014
Published: 25 October 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Apr 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Corrine Voils|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Jul 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hana Morrissey|
|26 Aug 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kevin Mc Namara|
|24 Sep 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Corrine Voils|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Sep 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Oct 2014||Editorially accepted|
|25 Oct 2014||Article published||10.1186/s12913-014-0490-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.