Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Utility of routine data sources for feedback on the quality of cancer care: an assessment based on clinical practice guidelines

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Dec 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Molla Donaldson
25 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Walling
26 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Michael Coory
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Molla Donaldson
24 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Walling
20 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Michael Coory
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Michael Coory
Resubmission - Version 5
14 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
27 May 2009 Editorially accepted
27 May 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-9-84

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement