Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Jun 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Jul 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stuart James Peacock
9 Jul 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ed Wilson
20 Aug 2008 Author responded Author comments - Shannon Sibbald
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Aug 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ed Wilson
22 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stuart James Peacock
4 Dec 2008 Author responded Author comments - Shannon Sibbald
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Dec 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stuart James Peacock
20 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ed Wilson
13 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Angela Coulter
24 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Shannon Sibbald
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
5 Mar 2009 Editorially accepted
5 Mar 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-9-43

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement