Income development of General Practitioners in eight European countries from 1975 to 2005
© Kroneman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 24 January 2008
Accepted: 09 February 2009
Published: 09 February 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|24 Jan 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Jun 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sandra Hollinghurst|
|28 Jul 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matt Sutton|
|2 Oct 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Madelon Kroneman|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Oct 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Oct 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sandra Hollinghurst|
|23 Dec 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matt Sutton|
|9 Jan 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Madelon Kroneman|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Jan 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|22 Jan 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Madelon Kroneman|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|22 Jan 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|9 Feb 2009||Editorially accepted|
|9 Feb 2009||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-9-26|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.