Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The use of evidence in public governmental reports on health policy: an analysis of 17 Norwegian official reports (NOU)

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Dec 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benedicte Carlsen
26 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maureen Dobbins
29 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karin Guldbrandsson
3 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Simon Innvær
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karin Guldbrandsson
16 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benedicte Carlsen
23 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maureen Dobbins
18 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Simon Innvær
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Groenewegen
10 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - Simon Innvær
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - Simon Innvær
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
10 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Groenewegen
28 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Simon Innvær
Resubmission - Version 6
28 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
28 Sep 2009 Editorially accepted
28 Sep 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-9-177

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement