Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of hospital charge prediction models for gastric cancer patients: neural network vs. decision tree models

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Dec 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonas Almeida
18 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Azzam Fouad George Taktak
14 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jing Wang
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonas Almeida
16 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Azzam Fouad George Taktak
26 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jing Wang
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Azzam Fouad George Taktak
10 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jing Wang
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
14 Sep 2009 Editorially accepted
14 Sep 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-9-161

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement