Open Peer Review Reports for: The SAIL Databank: building a national architecture for e-health research and evaluation
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
23 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
3 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Parkinson |
31 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fortunato Castillo |
7 Apr 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark McGilchrist |
18 Jun 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - kerina jones |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
18 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
2 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fortunato Castillo |
7 Jul 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mark McGilchrist |
31 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - kerina jones |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
31 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
26 Aug 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - kerina jones |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
26 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
4 Sep 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
4 Sep 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-9-157 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.