Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Preferences for treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): a discrete choice experiment

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Sep 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Sep 2008 Author responded Author comments - Axel C. Mühlbacher
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Sep 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter M. Wehmeier
8 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Terry Flynn
16 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Axel C. Mühlbacher
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
30 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter M. Wehmeier
12 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Terry Flynn
16 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Axel C. Mühlbacher
Resubmission - Version 6
16 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
12 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Terry Flynn
20 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - Axel C. Mühlbacher
Resubmission - Version 7
20 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 7
30 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - Axel C. Mühlbacher
Resubmission - Version 8
30 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
13 Aug 2009 Editorially accepted
13 Aug 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-9-149

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement