Skip to main content

Table 3 Differences between clinicians compared with referral tendency.

From: Attitudes towards 12-step groups and referral practices in a 12-step naive treatment culture; a survey of addiction professionals in Norway

Characteristics

Did not refer (N = 172)

Low frequent referrers * (N = 67)

High frequent

referrers ** (N = 40)

P-value

Gender: % women

134 (77.9%)

43 (64.2%)

24 (60.0%)

0.02

Age, years

44.0 (10.0)

44 (10.8)

47.9 (9.8)

0.08

Working experience in the addiction field; months

88.2 (74.4)

103.0 (87.1)

94.8 (71.1)

0.41

Twelve step treatment unit present in the county

38 (22.1%)

29 (43.3%)

29 (72.5%)

<0.001

Personal attitude about TSGs (scale 0 – 10, score 10 is most positive)

7.3 (1.5)

8.1 (1.6)

9.0 (1.1)

<0.001

Attitude about TSG subscale items (scale 0 – 10):

    

   How helpful are TSGs?

7.0 (1.9)

8.0 (1.8)

9.1 (1.3)

<0.001

   How important are TSGs to the recovery process of patients?

7.1 (1.8)

8.1 (1.9)

9.0 (1.2)

<0.001

   How important are TSGs in the treatment system?

6.8 (1.9)

7.7 (2.0)

8.7 (1.6)

<0.001

   Harmfulness of TSGs (scale 0 – 10, score 10 is harmless)

8.2 (1.7)

8.6 (1.6)

9.1 (0.9)

0.003

Perceived openness to TSGs at workplace (scale 0 – 10)

7.0 (2.5)

7.9 (2.3)

8.7 (1.8)

<0.001

Self efficacy to make TSG referrals (scale 0 – 10)

4.3 (2.5)

6.2 (2.4)

7.3 (2.3)

<0.001

TSG knowledge scale score (scale 0 – 14)

6.8 (2.9)

8.8 (3.0)

10.0 (3.1)

<0.001

Interest in obtaining additional information about TSGs (scale 0 – 10)

6.7 (2.7)

7.1 (2.4)

8.9 (2.0)

<0.001

Integration and use of the 12-steps in daily treatment work (N = 275)

14 (8.2%)

23 (34.8%)

22 (56.4%)

<0.001

Ever attended AA/NA meeting (N = 278)

40 (23.4%)

25 (37.3%)

23 (57.5%)

<0.001

  1. N (%) or mean (SD). P-value obtained from ANOVA or Chi-square (N = 279)
  2. * <50% of patients
  3. ** >50% of patients