Skip to main content

Table 7 Laboratory perception of barriers to providing MOT (for testing labs and referring labs that wished to conduct MOT on-site)

From: Postal survey of physicians and laboratories: Practices and perceptions of molecular oncology testing

 

Testing labs No. (%)

Referring labs@ No. (%)

p-value

 

Some impact

High impact

Some impact

High impact

High impact

Lack of funding for capital equipment

5/15 (33.3)

6/15 (40.0)

2/17 (11.8)

14/17 (82.4)

0.014

Lack of funding for technical staff

5/16 (31.2)

11/16 (68.8)

3/17 (17.6)

13/17 (76.5)

0.708*

Lack of funding for development of new tests (test work up)

6/16 (37.5)

10/16 (62.5)

4/17 (23.5)

12/17 (70.6)

0.622

Lack of funding for ongoing provision of tests

8/16 (50.0)

8/16 (50.0)

3/17 (17.6)

12/17 (70.6)

0.226

Lack of qualified technical staff

6/16 (37.5)

4/16 (25.0)

2/17 (11.8)

9/17 (56.3)

0.101

Lack of MDs and/or PhDs with appropriate expertise

6/16 (37.5)

3/16 (18.8)

3/17 (17.6)

6/17 (37.5)

0.438*

Lack of clinical demand

1/15 (6.7)

6/15 (40.0)

3/17 (17.6)

1/17 (5.9)

0.033*

Lack of appropriate test regulation and oversight

3/15 (20.0)

2/15 (13.3)

1/17 (5.9)

0/17 (0)

0.212*

Existence of restrictive patents or licenses

2/16 (12.5)

3/16 (18.8)

1/17 (5.9)

1/17 (5.9)

0.335*

  1. @Referring labs were told to skip the question if they did not want to provide MOT on-site
  2. *Fisher exact test