Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Impact of quality of evidence on the strength of recommendations: an empirical study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Dec 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Shiffman
23 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrea Horvath
30 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Benjamin Djulbegovic
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Shiffman
1 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrea Horvath
2 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rafael Perera
30 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Benjamin Djulbegovic
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - Benjamin Djulbegovic
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
20 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - Benjamin Djulbegovic
Resubmission - Version 7
20 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
21 Jul 2009 Editorially accepted
21 Jul 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-9-120

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement