Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Methods of data collection and analysis for the economic evaluation alongside a national, multi-centre trial in the UK: Conventional ventilation or ECMO for Severe Adult Respiratory Failure (CESAR)

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Dec 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Dec 2007 Author responded Author comments - Miranda Mugford
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Dec 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Miranda Mugford
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Mar 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reijo Sund
17 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Miranda Mugford
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
18 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Miranda Mugford
Resubmission - Version 8
18 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
30 Apr 2008 Editorially accepted
30 Apr 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-8-94

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement