Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Geographical variations in the benefit of applying a prioritization system for cataract surgery in different regions of Spain

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 May 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lorne Bellan
6 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Cromwell
17 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roberto Grilli
25 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luigi Siciliani
17 Sep 2007 Author responded Author comments - Xavier Castells
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Sep 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roberto Grilli
10 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Cromwell
17 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luigi Siciliani
14 Nov 2007 Author responded Author comments - Xavier Castells
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Nov 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Cromwell
17 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Xavier Castells
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
4 Feb 2008 Editorially accepted
4 Feb 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-8-32

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement