Skip to main content

Table 2 Bivariate relationships between background characteristics, attitudes towards future work and general practice (mean score) and gender of medical students of the Maastricht University in 2002/03.

From: Shortage in general practice despite the feminisation of the medical workforce: a seeming paradox? A cohort study

 

Before the clerkship

 

After the clerkship

 
 

Mean (SD)

 

Mean (SD)

 
 

Male

Female

P value

Male

Female

P value

Likelihood to become a GP (1 = not likely, 5 = highly likely)

2.4(.7)

2.9(.9)

.00

2.7 (.9)

3.1 (1.1)

.003

Background characteristics (0 = no,1 = yes)

Work experience in patient care

.3 (.4)

.6 (.4)

.00

   

Other health care education

.3 (.4)

.4 (.4)

.084

   

Having considered allied profession

.1 (.3)

.3 (.4)

.001

   

Preferred patients category and type of work (1 = not interested, 5 = interested)

Chronic patients and palliative care

3 (.7)

3.5 (.6)

.003

3(.7)

3.5(.6)

.00

Acute patient care and technology-orie oriented work

4 (.6)

3.6 (.6)

.001

4.2(.6)

3.8(.6)

.002

Preferred work conditions (1 = not important, 5 = important)

Prestige orientation

2.65(.8)

2.15(.8)

.00

2.9(.7)

2.45(.8)

.00

Controllable lifestyle orientation

2.95(.9)

3.4(.8)

.001

2.85(.9)

3.5(.8)

.00

Assessment of becoming a general practitioner (1 = not attractive, 5 = attractive)

   Work intrinsic

3.8(.6)

4(.5)

.00

3.8(.6)

3.8(.6)

.125

   Work extrinsic

2.6(.6)

2.6 (.5)

.399

3(.6)

3(.6)

.453

   Work conditions

3.2(.8)

3.3(.8)

.618

3.5(.9)

3.5(.8)

.586

  1. ANOVA was performed. P- values are two-sided. N = 175.