Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Complaints handling in hospitals: an empirical study of discrepancies between patients' expectations and their experiences

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Oct 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Studdert
19 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wayne Kenneth Cunningham
23 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Roland Friele
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 May 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Studdert
2 Jul 2008 Author responded Author comments - Roland Friele
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Jul 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Aug 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Studdert
11 Sep 2008 Author responded Author comments - Roland Friele
Resubmission - Version 4
11 Sep 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
29 Sep 2008 Author responded Author comments - Roland Friele
Resubmission - Version 8
29 Sep 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
30 Sep 2008 Editorially accepted
30 Sep 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-8-199

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement