This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Country differences in the diagnosis and management of coronary heart disease – a comparison between the US, the UK and Germany
© Knesebeck et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 13 February 2008
Accepted: 29 September 2008
Published: 29 September 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Feb 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Mar 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Groenewegen|
|9 May 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Neal|
|14 May 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patrick McBride|
|14 Jul 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Olaf von dem Knesebeck|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Jul 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Jul 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patrick McBride|
|26 Jul 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Neal|
|11 Aug 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Groenewegen|
|11 Sep 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Olaf von dem Knesebeck|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Sep 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Sep 2008||Editorially accepted|
|29 Sep 2008||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-8-198|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.