Skip to main content

Table 6 Dimension 5: Crude and adjusted associations between patient characteristics and patients' evaluation of aspects of the accessibility.

From: Patient characteristics associated with differences in patients' evaluation of their general practitioner

  

100% positive assessments 1

0–49% positive assessments 2

  

Prev.(%)

PR

Adj. PR

95% CI

Prev.(%)

PR

Adj.PR

95% CI

Gender

(N = 25560)

Female

29.1

1

1

 

34.0

1

1

 
 

Male

32.3

1.11

0.97

0.93 – 1.02

30.7

0.90

0.99

0.94 – 1.03

Age (years)

(N = 25560)

18–24

17.8

1

1

 

39.5

1

1

 
 

25–29

19.7

1.11

1.09

0.94 – 1.26

40.7

1.03

1.04

0.96 – 1.13

 

30–34

21.0

1.18

1.19

1.03 – 1.37

39.4

1.00

0.98

0.90 – 1.07

 

35–39

21.5

1.21

1.25

1.09 – 1.44

40.0

1.01

0.97

0.89 – 1.06

 

40–44

23.6

1.32

1.42

1.23 – 1.64

39.5

1.00

0.93

0.85 – 1.02

 

45–49

26.5

1.49

1.62

1.41 – 1.87

35.7

0.90

0.83

0.76 – 0.91

 

50–54

27.9

1.57

1.75

1.52 – 2.01

35.0

0.88

0.80

0.73 – 0.88

 

55–59

34.3

1.92

2.17

1.90 – 2.48

29.4

0.74

0.67

0.61 – 0.75

 

60–64

38.5

2.16

2.44

2.12 – 2.80

26.5

0.67

0.60

0.54 – 0.67

 

65–69

42.6

2.39

2.72

2.37 – 3.12

22.9

0.58

0.53

0.46 – 0.59

 

70–74

46.7

2.62

2.99

2.61 – 3.42

20.8

0.53

0.48

0.42 – 0.54

 

75–79

46.5

2.61

2.97

2.60 – 3.39

20.2

0.51

0.46

0.40 – 0.53

 

80+

45.7

2.56

2.96

2.57 – 3.41

22.4

0.57

0.51

0.45 – 0.57

Further education (years)

(N = 24385)

None

32.6

1

1

 

31.7

1

1

 
 

Less than 2

30.6

0.90

1.08

0.99 – 1.16

34.7

1.09

1.00

0.93 – 1.08

 

2–4

28.6

0.76

1.00

0.95 – 1.06

34.1

1.08

0.98

0.93 – 1.03

 

5 or more

29.3

0.66

1.02

0.94 – 1.10

32.1

1.01

0.93

0.86 – 1.01

 

Undergoing education or other

32.2

0.80

1.16

1.06 – 1.27

28.8

0.91

0.83

0.75 – 0.91

Frequency of attendance (times per year)

(N = 25560)

0–1

28.3

1

1

 

35.9

1

1

 
 

2–3

26.9

0.95

0.99

0.92 – 1.07

37.0

1.03

1.00

0.94 – 1.06

 

4–5

29.8

1.05

1.06

0.98 – 1.14

33.5

0.93

0.92

0.86 – 0.98

 

6–7

31.4

1.11

1.14

1.04 – 1.24

30.0

0.84

0.81

0.75 – 0.87

 

8–9

33.9

1.20

1.21

1.11 – 1.33

28.5

0.79

0.77

0.70 – 0.84

 

10+

35.3

1.25

1.30

1.20 – 1.42

26.8

0.75

0.69

0.64 – 0.75

Duration of listing (years)

(N = 17001)

Less than 1

24.6

1

1

 

36.8

1

1

 
 

1–2

25.9

1.05

0.99

0.87 – 1.12

36.1

0.98

1.03

0.94 – 1.12

 

3–7

27.2

1.11

1.00

0.89 – 1.12

34.7

0.94

1.01

0.93 – 1.09

 

8–12

31.8

1.29

1.12

0.98 – 1.28

31.6

0.86

0.95

0.86 – 1.05

 

13+

38.0

1.55

1.29

1.13 – 1.48

26.5

0.72

0.82

0.73 – 0.92

Self-rated health

(N = 25560)

Excellent

30.6

1

1

 

30.1

1

1

 
 

Very good

28.6

0.93

0.83

0.78 – 0.89

33.6

1.11

1.19

1.11 – 1.28

 

Good

30.6

1.00

0.68

0.64 – 0.73

33.4

1.11

1.44

1.34 – 1.54

 

Fair

30.7

1.00

0.60

0.55 – 0.65

33.3

1.11

1.64

1.51 – 1.78

 

Poor

33.0

1.08

0.62

0.56 – 0.70

29.2

0.97

1.49

1.31 – 1.69

Chronic condition

(N = 25197)

No

27.6

1

1

 

35.2

1

1

 
 

Yes-KRTC

36.6

1.33

1.04

0.98 – 1.10

27.9

0.79

0.97

0.91 – 1.03

 

Yes-other or multiple

30.5

1.10

1.01

0.96 – 1.06

32.1

0.91

0.95

0.91 – 1.00

Chronic condition

(N = 17208)

None

27.6

1

1

 

35.2

1

1

 
 

K – Cardiovascular

37.7

1.37

1.01

0.94 – 1.09

26.1

0.74

0.96

0.86 – 1.06

 

R – Respiratory

32.3

1.17

1.04

0.95 – 1.15

31.8

0.90

0.99

0.90 – 1.09

 

T – Endocrine

37.0

1.34

1.08

0.99 – 1.17

28.9

0.82

0.98

0.88 – 1.09

 

C – Cancer

42.7

1.55

1.15

1.01 – 1.32

22.3

0.63

0.78

0.61 – 0.98

  1. Prevalence ratio (PR) for 100% positive assessments and for 0–49% positive assessments associated with different patient characteristics. Crude PRs are adjusted for clustering of patients. Adjusted PRs are adjusted for patients' gender, age, frequency of attending a GP, self-rated health and clustering of patients. Numbers in italics are used to indicate statistical significance.
  2. 1 Patients who marked 100% of the answered questions in one of the two most positive answering categories.
  3. 2 Patients who marked less than 50% (0–49%) of the answered questions in one of the two most positive answering categories.
  4. 3 Poisson regression with robust variance