Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Developing and testing an instrument to measure the presence of conditions for successful implementation of quality improvement collaboratives

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Oct 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dimitris Niakas
8 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susanne Hempel
29 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Michel Dückers
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Jun 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dimitris Niakas
10 Jun 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susanne Hempel
15 Jul 2008 Author responded Author comments - Michel Dückers
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Jul 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Aug 2008 Author responded Author comments - Michel Dückers
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Aug 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
11 Aug 2008 Editorially accepted
11 Aug 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-8-172

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement