Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Improving the accuracy of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal disease notification rates using data linkage

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Jan 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julie Pavlin
19 Mar 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Graham Moon
23 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Rochelle Watkins
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Apr 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Graham Moon
1 May 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julie Pavlin
19 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Rochelle Watkins
Resubmission - Version 3
19 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
28 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Rochelle Watkins
Resubmission - Version 6
28 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
30 May 2008 Editorially accepted
30 May 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-8-118

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement