Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Maintaining quality of health services after abolition of user fees: A Uganda case study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Jun 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Jul 2007 Author responded Author comments - Juliet Nabyonga-Orem
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Jul 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Bishai
18 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Steffen Flessa
21 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Juliet Nabyonga-Orem
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Juliet Nabyonga-Orem
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
25 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Bishai
3 Mar 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Steffen Flessa
22 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Juliet Nabyonga-Orem
Resubmission - Version 6
22 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
24 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Juliet Nabyonga-Orem
Resubmission - Version 8
24 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
30 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Juliet Nabyonga-Orem
Resubmission - Version 10
30 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
9 May 2008 Editorially accepted
9 May 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-8-102

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement