Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Decision-making regarding total knee replacement surgery: A qualitative meta-synthesis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Nov 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Nov 2006 Author responded Author comments - Tracey O'Neill
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Nov 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Dec 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rosaline Barbour
4 Jan 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Thomson
5 Feb 2007 Author responded Author comments - Tracey O'Neill
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Feb 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Mar 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Thomson
15 Mar 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rosaline Barbour
27 Mar 2007 Author responded Author comments - Tracey O'Neill
Resubmission - Version 5
27 Mar 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
5 Apr 2007 Author responded Author comments - Tracey O'Neill
Resubmission - Version 6
5 Apr 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
10 Apr 2007 Editorially accepted
10 Apr 2007 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-7-52

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement