Skip to main content

Table 7 Dimension 5: Crude and adjusted associations between patients' evaluation of aspects of the accessibility.

From: Doctor and practice characteristics associated with differences in patient evaluations of general practice

  

Most positive assessments*

Poor assessments†

  

Prev‡ (%)

Crude PR§

Pt-adj. PR||

Adj. PR¶

Adj. 95%CI**

Prev‡ (%)

Crude PR§

Pt-adj. PR||

Adj. PR¶

Adj. 95%CI**

Gender

          

(N = 365)

Female

24.6

1

1

1††

 

38.7

1

1

1

 
 

Male

33,1

1,35

1,21

1,09

0,98; 1,21

29,9

0,77

0,83

0,91

0,84; 0,99

Goodness of fit (p)

    

1.00

    

0.29

Age (years)

          

(N = 365)

-39

25.8

1

1

1††

 

34.2

1

1

1

 
 

40–49

28,7

1,11

1,12

1,00

0,79; 1,26

34,8

1,02

1,03

1,09

0,91; 1,30

 

50–59

30,5

1,18

1,15

0,99

0,78; 1,26

32,8

0,96

0,98

1,10

0,92; 1,32

 

60 +

35,9

1,39

1,25

1,04

0,77; 1,39

26,2

0,77

0,84

0,98

0,77; 1,24

Goodness of fit (p)

    

1.00

    

0.29

Seniority ‡‡ (years)

          

(N = 255)

0–2

25.1

1

1

1††

 

33.2

1

1

1

 
 

3–5

25,7

1,02

1,02

0,99

0,79; 1,24

37,3

1,12

1,14

1,16

0,95; 1,41

 

6–10

32,5

1,29

1,24

1,05

0,81; 1,35

29,7

0,89

0,92

1,07

0,84; 1,36

 

11–20

32,1

1,28

1,24

1,18

0,92; 1,51

31,6

0,95

0,97

1,08

0,85; 1,38

 

21 +

34,6

1,38

1,26

1,26

0,96; 1,65

28,8

0,87

0,92

1,04

0,80; 1,35

Goodness of fit (p)

    

1.00

    

0.92

Working hours/week

          

(N = 360)

-21

26.0

1

1

1††

 

31.4

1

1

1

 
 

22–37

27,6

1,06

1,11

1,14

0,83; 1,55

34,4

1,10

1,09

0,96

0,75; 1,24

 

38–44

30,2

1,16

1,18

1,10

0,80; 1,50

34,1

1,09

1,10

1,02

0,79; 1,32

 

45 +

33,3

1,28

1,27

1,00

0,72; 1,39

30,3

0,97

0,99

1,05

0,80; 1,37

Goodness of fit (p)

    

1.00

    

0.29

Urbanity

          

(N = 361)

Urban

33.0

1

1

1††

 

30.1

1

1

1

 
 

Rural

30,0

0,91

0,83

0,97

0,84; 1,12

35,6

1,18

0,97

1,11

0,99; 1,25

 

Urban/rural

25,5

0,77

0,73

0,91

0,82; 1,02

36,8

1,22

1,26

1,04

0,95; 1,14

Goodness of fit (p)

    

1.00

    

0.27

List size (patients/GP)

          

(N = 360)

-1000

31.9

1

1

1††

 

27.4

1

1

1

 
 

1001–1600

29,0

0,91

0,89

0,89

0,74; 1,07

34,3

1,25

1,25

1,27

1,05; 1,54

 

1601–2000

32,0

1,00

1,01

0,88

0,71; 1,08

31,6

1,15

1,13

1,33

1,07; 1,64

 

2000 +

29,6

0,93

0,92

0,81

0,62; 1,04

33,8

1,23

1,21

1,48

1,19; 1,83

Goodness of fit (p)

    

1.00

    

0.74

Practice organisation §§

          

(N = 364)

Single

46.2

1

1††

1††

 

18.7

1

1

1

 
 

Shared single

30,9

0,67

0,70

0,56

0,44; 0,72

29,5

1,58

1,52

1,75

1,36; 2,25

 

Group of singles

33,8

0,73

0,79

0,68

0,56; 0,82

27,2

1,46

1,39

1,53

1,23; 1,89

 

Partnership

24,6

0,53

0,55

0,52

0,46; 0,58

38,5

2,06

2,01

2,07

1,76; 2,43

 

Part-time partnership

20,1

0,44

0,45

0,40

0,34; 0,46

42,0

2,25

2,18

2,34

1,98; 2,78

Goodness of fit (p)

    

1.00

    

0.29

Staff (employees/GP)||||

          

(N = 358)

0–0.5

32.1

1

1

1††

 

31.1

1

1

1

 
 

0.51–0.86

27,4

0,85

0,84

0,81

0,69; 0,94

34,8

1,12

1,15

1,14

1,00; 1,29

 

0.87–1

32,3

1,00

0,96

0,76

0,64; 0,91

31,7

1,02

1,06

1,21

1,05; 1,39

 

1.01–1.49

26,0

0,81

0,78

0,69

0,56; 0,85

37,9

1,22

1,24

1,27

1,08; 1,49

 

1.5 +

36,0

1,12

1,10

0,73

0,57; 0,94

25,3

0,81

0,84

1,21

0,98; 1,49

Goodness of fit (p)

    

1.00

    

0.29

Teaching out of practice

          

(N = 359)

No

30.5

1

1

1††

 

33.1

1

1

1

 
 

Yes

28,2

0,92

0,92

0,92

0,83; 1,02

33.2

1,00

1,00

0,99

0,90; 1,08

Goodness of fit (p)

    

1.00

    

0.36

Training practice

          

(N = 358)

No

37.2

1

1

1††

 

27,2

1

1

1

 
 

Yes

26.1

0,70

0,71

0,88

0,80; 0,97

36.2

1,33

1,33

1,07

0,97; 1,17

Goodness of fit (p)

    

1.00

    

0.17

  1. Prevalence ratio (PR) for 100% positive assessments and for 0–49% positive assessments associated with different patient characteristics. Crude PRs are adjusted for patient clustering. Patient-adjusted PRs are adjusted for patients' gender, age, frequency of attending a general practitioner (GP) and self-rated health and patient clustering. Fully adjusted PRs are adjusted for GPs' gender, age, weekly working hours, organisation of practice and staff in addition to patients' gender, age, frequency of attending a GP, self-rated health and patient clustering. The goodness of model fitting is shown regarding the fully adjusted PRs (p-values).
  2. * Patients who marked 100% of the answered questions in one of the two most positive answering categories.
  3. † Patients who marked less than 50% (0–49%) of the answered questions in one of the two most positive answering categories.
  4. ‡ Prevalence
  5. § Crude prevalence ratio is the unadjusted prevalence ratio adjusted for patient clustering
  6. || Patient-adjusted prevalence ratio is the prevalence ratio adjusted for patients' gender, age, frequency of attending a GP and self-rated health and patient clustering.
  7. ¶ Fully adjusted prevalence ratio is the prevalence ratio adjusted for GPs' gender, age, weekly working hours, organisation of practice and staff in addition to patients' gender, age, frequency of attending a GP, self-rated health and patient clustering.
  8. ** 95% confidence interval for the fully adjusted prevalence ratio.
  9. †† Poisson regression with robust variance
  10. ‡‡ Seniority in present practice
  11. §§ "Single" = single-haned, "Shared single" = two ore more GPs sharing a single-handed practice, "Group of singles" = single-handed GPs sharing premises and staff, "Partnership" = GPs sharing patient-list, premises and staff, "Part-time partnership" = partnership practices with all GPs working part-time
  12. |||| Number converted to full-time working employees
Back to article page

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us