Table 4 Network level correlations: data use, perceptions about data use, and organisational contextual factors
From: Use of comparative data for integrated cancer services
| Â | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Total use | 1 | Â | Â | Â |
2. Assess quality | -.04 | 1 | Â | Â |
3. Perceived barriers | .13 | -.17 | 1 | Â |
4. Limited dataset receptivity | -.46* | .52** | -.37* | 1 |
5. Time in role | .24 | -.22 | .43* | -.41* |
6. Cancer population | -.24 | -.04 | .21 | .13 |
7. No. of SHAs | .06 | .07 | .08 | -.01 |
8. No. of PCTs | .11 | .10 | .13 | .13 |
9. No. of hospital trusts | .14 | .29 | -.06 | .24 |
10. Crosses Registry region | .28 | .30 | -.06 | -.07 |
11. Presence of Info-Lead | -.06 | .13 | .11 | -.06 |