Skip to main content

Table 1 Studies included in the Review with specifications of implementation strategies and efficacy of treatment and costs

From: Effectiveness and costs of implementation strategies to reduce acid suppressive drug prescriptions: a systematic review

Authors, year

Research design

Evidence quality

Study characteristics: Population; i+c gr. (A) Participants (B) Stakeholders (C)

Method characteristics: Intervention type (A) Content guideline (B) Practical Attributes (C)

Implementation strategy

Results treatment

Results costs

41. Bursey & Crowley 2000

Dynamic population cohort

B

A: 110.000 residents of NF-land, Canada

B: All GPs

C: Government

A: Authorisation program for reimbursement.

B: Patient selection for PPI use.

C: Algorithm for prescription management.

I. passive

> 80% decrease PPI

PPI < 82% ($1.3 mil) first year; <62% after 2 years.

ASD <36% ($2.0 mil) first year; <16% after 2 years

42. Ladabaum & Fendrick 2001

Prospective multicentre trial.

B

A: P. ulcer patients (54+39)

B: PC-centres (3+3), GPs?

C: University Michigan.

A: Interactive sessions by GE.

B: Test & treat strategy

C: H. pylori serological test for PC.

III. multiple

32% more tests; same referrals;

31% less prescriptions (p > .001)

79% in intervention group ($ 122 pp) (p = .17)

43. Chan & Patel 2001

RCT

A2

A: All dyspepsia patients

B: GPs (133+146); voluntary Hampshire

C: Health authority

A: Posted guidelines and reinforcement visits by NP

B: Management dyspepsia, H pylori.

C: Wall chart, booklet

III. multiple

-

5% decrease in medication

44. Huren-kamp & Grund-meijer 2001

RCT

A2

A: H. pylori patients (89/85)

B: 48 GP practices, voluntary

C: University Amsterdam

A: Education of protocol; support by NP.

B: Tapering prescriptions of ASD by doses and on demand treatment.

C: follow up patients by NP.

III. multiple

Decrease of 1,5 PDD;

40% stopped ASD (ns);

More HP neg, more H2RA

-

45. Weynen & de Wit 2002

RCT Cluster

A2

A: 260 (99/73/88) patients

B: 28 GPs; voluntary

C: University Utrecht

A: Education program, financial incentives and personal feedback.

B: H. Pylori diagnosis and treatment

C: Dyspepsia questionnaire, HP test.

III. multiple

17% better follow-up (ns), in incentive group

Less overall costs (€46 pp; ns) in incentive group

46. Banait & Sibbald 2003

RCT cluster,

A2

A: Practice population (265.000)

B: GP practices (57+56); voluntary NW England.

C: University, GE, Health authorities.

A: Posted guidelines with education outreach and follow-up visit.

B: Clinical strategies for referral.

C: Open access to endo-scopies and serological tests

III. multiple

14% more referrals, 4 more tests/practice

6% more costs ASD

47. Jones & Lydeard 1993

RCT,

A2

A: Practice population (500.000)

B: GPs (78+101); voluntary; Southampton

C: Consensus group GP+GE

A: Consensus meetings GP-SP.

B: Investigation and refer dyspepsia; appropriate use of guidelines.

C: reference cards,

II. single

No difference in referrals and endoscopies

22% more prescribing costs

48. Allison & Hurley 2003

RCT

A2

A: ASD patients (321+329).

B: Physicians from study

C: HMO California

A: Test & treatment random group.

B: T&T protocol

C: Detailed instructions

II single

Less ulcerlike symptoms and abdominal pain;

8% less users' medication

Higher costs because of HP treatment (not hospital)

49. Kearney & Liu 2004

Follow up Cohort

B

A: ASD patients (432)

B: GE from study

C: MHO Seattle

A: Patient Interview and HP test

B: Hospital stopped ASD medicine

C: Instruction for GPs' review.

I. passive

71% ulcer;

29% dyspepsia; number stopped?

Hospital $34 less pp;

Medication ns;

Only ulcer cases

50. Krol & Wensing 2004

RTC cluster

A2

A: ASD patients (63+50)

B: 20 GP practices voluntary

C: University Utrecht

A: Direct mail to patients to reduce ASD.

B: Postal instructions for patients.

C: Instruction and flowchart

II single

17% reduction (10% stopped); no change in symptoms and quality

-