Skip to main content

Table 3 Operating characteristics of the coding algorithms according to diagnostic coding system (ICD-9-CM vs. ICD-10) *

From: Validation of ICD-9-CM/ICD-10 coding algorithms for the identification of patients with acetaminophen overdose and hepatotoxicity using administrative data

Outcome/Coding System

Sensitivity (95% CI)

Specificity (95% CI)

PPV (95% CI)

NPV (95% CI)

C-statistic (95% CI)

Acetaminophen overdose

     

   ICD-9-CM

91% (83–96%) (81/89)

81% (61–93%) (21/26)

94% (87–98%) (81/86)

72% (53–87%) (21/29)

0.86 (0.78–0.94)

   ICD-10

88% (77–95%) (44/50)

88% (62–98%) (14/16)

96% (85–99%) (44/46)

70% (46–88%) (14/20)

0.88 (0.78–0.97)

Hepatotoxicity

     

   ICD-9-CM

97% (86–100%) (36/37)

80% (66–90%) (39/49)

78% (64–89%) (36/46)

98% (87–100%) (39/40)

0.88 (0.82–0.95)

   ICD-10

86% (65–97%) (19/22)

96% (79–100%) (23/24)

95% (75–100%) (19/20)

88% (70–98%) (23/26)

0.91 (0.83–0.99)

Acute liver failure

     

   ICD-9-CM

85% (55–98%) (11/13)

85% (75–92%) (62/73)

50% (28–72%) (11/22)

97% (89–100%) (62/64)

0.85 (0.74–0.96)

   ICD-10

100% (N/A) (9/9)

86% (71–95%) (32/37)

64% (35–87%) (9/14)

100% (NA) (32/32)

0.93 (0.88–0.99)

  1. * None of the comparisons between the ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 coding systems are statistically significant (P > 0.05 for all).
  2. CI, confidence interval; NPV, negative predictive value; NA, not applicable; PPV, positive predictive value.