Skip to main content

Table 4 Logistic regression models of the non-agreement between adolescents and proxy respondents (95%CI) in responses on different socio-economic variables

From: Self-reported social class in adolescents: validity and relationship with gradients in self-reported health

   Non-agreement on paternal education Non-agreement on maternal education Non-agreement on highest education Non-agreement on paternal OSC Non-agreement on maternal OSC Non-agreement on highest OSC
Age > 15 1a 1a 1a 1a 1a 1a
  12–15 0.83 (0.3 – 2.2) 0.47 (0.2 – 1.4) 0.76 (0.3 – 2.0) 0.73 (0.3 – 2.0) 0.44 (0.2 – 1.2) 0.38 (0.1 – 1.2)
Sex Male 1a 1a 1a 1a 1a 1a
  Female 1.30 (0.5 – 3.3) 1.2 (0.4 – 2.9) 0.90 (0.3 – 2.3) 2.6 (0.9 – 6.9) 0.95 (0.4 – 2.5) 1.22 (0.4 – 3.5)
Family typeb Standard 1a 1a 1a 1a 1a 1a
  Non-standard 1.15 (0.3 – 3.9) 2.28 (0.6 – 7.8) 0.63 (0.2 – 2.2) 4.98 (1.3 – 18.8) 3.0 (0.9 – 10.4) 4.63 (1.1 – 19.2)
Resilience High (>p25) 1a 1a 1a 1a 1a 1a
  Low (≤p25) 0.65 (0.2 – 1.8) 1.25 (0.4 – 3.7) 0.95 (0.3 – 2.7) 1.31 (0.4 – 4.01) 0.69 (0.2 – 2.09) 0.85 (0.2 – 3.01)
Risks Low (>p25) 1a 1a 1a 1a 1a 1a
  High(≤p25) 0.62 (0.2 – 1.8) 0.6 (0.2 – 1.9) 0.88 (0.3 – 2.6) 0.67 (0.2 – 2.1) 0.97 (0.3 – 2.8) 0.64 (0.2 – 2.2)
Academic achievement High (>p25) 1a 1a 1a 1a 1a 1a
  Low (≤p25) 2.01 (0.6 – 6.2) 1.69 (0.5 – 5.6) 2.22 (0.7 – 6.8) 0.72 (0.2 – 2.2) 1.04 (0.3 – 3.2) 1.1 (0.3 – 3.8)
  1. The dependent variables have been calculated as: 0 = agreement between adolescents and proxies, 1 = non-agreement. a Reference category. b The category of "non-standard families" comprises both "single-parent" and "other" families. Each model is adjusted for the rest of variables in the table. Higher scores in the CHIP-AE domains means better health (better Resilience and academic achievement, and low Risks)