Table 4 Logistic regression models of the non-agreement between adolescents and proxy respondents (95%CI) in responses on different socio-economic variables

1^a

1^a

1^a

1^a

1^a

1^a

0.83 (0.3 – 2.2)

0.47 (0.2 – 1.4)

0.76 (0.3 – 2.0)

0.73 (0.3 – 2.0)

0.44 (0.2 – 1.2)

0.38 (0.1 – 1.2)

1^a

1^a

1^a

1^a

1^a

1^a

1.30 (0.5 – 3.3)

1.2 (0.4 – 2.9)

0.90 (0.3 – 2.3)

2.6 (0.9 – 6.9)

0.95 (0.4 – 2.5)

1.22 (0.4 – 3.5)

1^a

1^a

1^a

1^a

1^a

1^a

1.15 (0.3 – 3.9)

2.28 (0.6 – 7.8)

0.63 (0.2 – 2.2)

4.98 (1.3 – 18.8)

3.0 (0.9 – 10.4)

4.63 (1.1 – 19.2)

1^a

1^a

1^a

1^a

1^a

1^a

0.65 (0.2 – 1.8)

1.25 (0.4 – 3.7)

0.95 (0.3 – 2.7)

1.31 (0.4 – 4.01)

0.69 (0.2 – 2.09)

0.85 (0.2 – 3.01)

1^a

1^a

1^a

1^a

1^a

1^a

0.62 (0.2 – 1.8)

0.6 (0.2 – 1.9)

0.88 (0.3 – 2.6)

0.67 (0.2 – 2.1)

0.97 (0.3 – 2.8)

0.64 (0.2 – 2.2)

1^a

1^a

1^a

1^a

1^a

1^a

2.01 (0.6 – 6.2)

1.69 (0.5 – 5.6)

2.22 (0.7 – 6.8)

0.72 (0.2 – 2.2)

1.04 (0.3 – 3.2)

1.1 (0.3 – 3.8)