Skip to main content

Table 5 Appendix B. The frequency distribution for each of the measured variables.

From: The structure of quality systems is important to the process and outcome, an empirical study of 386 hospital departments in Sweden

Alternative

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

 

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Structure

       

A1

1.0

11.9

18.9

24.4

29.3

12.2

2.3

A2

3.4

14.5

21.8

23.1

19.9

15.0

2.3

A3

0.3

3.9

14.5

21.8

26.9

27.5

5.2

A4

1.6

7.8

8.8

16.6

20.5

24.9

19.9

A5

2.3

11.7

13.2

17.1

20.5

19.7

15.5

A6

1.8

8.3

9.8

14.0

22.0

28.5

15.5

Process

       

B1

0.5

6.2

13.5

18.1

29.8

25.1

6.7

B2

0.0

1.6

3.9

11.7

25.4

42.5

15.0

B3

0.0

4.4

7.8

14.5

25.6

35.2

12.4

B4

0.5

6.5

6.7

17.1

25.1

28.5

15.5

B5

1.6

9.8

15.3

22.3

25.1

17.9

8.0

B6

0.3

4.7

7.3

18.7

25.4

29.3

14.5

Outcome

       

C1

1.6

2.8

10.6

17.4

24.1

31.1

12.4

C2

3.1

8.3

14.0

14.5

25.9

20.7

13.5

C3

2.3

8.0

12.7

12.2

25.4

22.8

16.6

C4

1.8

4.9

8.8

14.5

24.1

29.3

16.6

C5

2.1

7.3

12.4

24.4

22.8

22.0

9.1

C6

0.8

6.7

11.4

19.7

30.1

25.9

5.4

  1. Response alternatives correspond to: 1 = "to a low degree", 7 = "to a high degree"