Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 5 Appendix B. The frequency distribution for each of the measured variables.

From: The structure of quality systems is important to the process and outcome, an empirical study of 386 hospital departments in Sweden

Alternative 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
  % % % % % % %
Structure        
A1 1.0 11.9 18.9 24.4 29.3 12.2 2.3
A2 3.4 14.5 21.8 23.1 19.9 15.0 2.3
A3 0.3 3.9 14.5 21.8 26.9 27.5 5.2
A4 1.6 7.8 8.8 16.6 20.5 24.9 19.9
A5 2.3 11.7 13.2 17.1 20.5 19.7 15.5
A6 1.8 8.3 9.8 14.0 22.0 28.5 15.5
Process        
B1 0.5 6.2 13.5 18.1 29.8 25.1 6.7
B2 0.0 1.6 3.9 11.7 25.4 42.5 15.0
B3 0.0 4.4 7.8 14.5 25.6 35.2 12.4
B4 0.5 6.5 6.7 17.1 25.1 28.5 15.5
B5 1.6 9.8 15.3 22.3 25.1 17.9 8.0
B6 0.3 4.7 7.3 18.7 25.4 29.3 14.5
Outcome        
C1 1.6 2.8 10.6 17.4 24.1 31.1 12.4
C2 3.1 8.3 14.0 14.5 25.9 20.7 13.5
C3 2.3 8.0 12.7 12.2 25.4 22.8 16.6
C4 1.8 4.9 8.8 14.5 24.1 29.3 16.6
C5 2.1 7.3 12.4 24.4 22.8 22.0 9.1
C6 0.8 6.7 11.4 19.7 30.1 25.9 5.4
  1. Response alternatives correspond to: 1 = "to a low degree", 7 = "to a high degree"