Skip to main content

Table 3 Module and existing information leaflet scores for quality, readability and suitability

From: Development and testing of innovative patient resources for the management of coronary heart disease (CHD): a descriptive study

  

Blood cholesterol (mean ± SD)

Blood pressure (mean ± SD)

Tobacco smoking (mean ± SD)

Physical activity (mean ± SD)

Combined new leaflets (mean ± SD)

Existing CR leaflets (mean ± SD)

p

Quality (DISCERN instrument)

Reliability†

3.7 ± 1.4

3.5 ± 1.3

3.5 ± 1.4

3.8 ± 1.2

3.6 ± 1.3

2.9 ± 1.9

0.002

 

Choices†

3.9 ± 1.2

3.8 ± 1.2

4.2 ± 0.9

3.9 ± 1.2

3.9 ± 1.2

2.6 ± 2.0

0.000

 

Overall rating†

4.0 ± 0.0

4.0 ± 0.0

4.0 ± 0.0

4.0 ± 0.0

4.0 ± 0.0

2.0 ± 0.0

0.000

 

Final result §

61.5

59.0

62.0

61.5

60.5

43.0

-

Readability (Flesch)

Reading ease‡

68

75

82

77

78

32

0.015

 

Description

standard

fairly easy

easy

fairly easy

fairly easy

difficult

-

 

Human interest *

71

70

70

70

70

4

0.000

 

Description

dramatic

dramatic

dramatic

dramatic

dramatic

scientific

-

 

Population able to understand

75%

80%

86%

80%

79%

24%

0.000

Suitability (SAM) rating **

 

83%

81%

81%

81%

81%

23%

0.000

  1. SAM = suitability assessment of materials, CR = cardiac rehabilitation.
  2. † scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (low quality) to 5 (high quality).
  3. §scores out of a possible 80 where higher scores represent higher quality.
  4. ‡ scores out of a possible 100, higher scores represent greater ease of understanding.
  5. * scores out of a possible 100, higher scores represent higher personal interest.
  6. ** sores out of a possible 100, higher scores represent greater suitability.
  7. p = probability of test statistic for difference between the combined new leaflets and the existing CR leaflets