Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Impact of briefly-assessed depression on secondary prevention outcomes after acute coronary syndrome: a one-year longitudinal survey

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Jun 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Jul 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Giorgio Baroldi
21 Sep 2005 Author responded Author comments - Frank Doyle
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Sep 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Sep 2005 Author responded Author comments - Frank Doyle
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Sep 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Dec 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Rumsfeld
5 Jan 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Giorgio Baroldi
20 Jan 2006 Author responded Author comments - Frank Doyle
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Jan 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Feb 2006 Author responded Author comments - Frank Doyle
Resubmission - Version 5
9 Feb 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
13 Feb 2006 Editorially accepted
13 Feb 2006 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-6-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement