Glucose testing and insufficient follow-up of abnormal results: a cohort study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Apr 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Apr 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Rathmann|
|28 Apr 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Annelli Sandbaek|
|31 May 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Lisa Kern|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|31 May 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Jun 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wolfgang Rathmann|
|3 Jul 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Annelli Sandbaek|
|11 Jul 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Lisa Kern|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Jul 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Jul 2006||Editorially accepted|
|12 Jul 2006||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-6-87|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.