Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Lay perceptions of evidence-based information – a qualitative evaluation of a website for back pain sufferers

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Sep 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Oct 2005 Author responded Author comments - Claire Glenton
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Oct 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Oct 2005 Author responded Author comments - Claire Glenton
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Oct 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Jan 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William Shaw
19 Jan 2006 Author responded Author comments - Claire Glenton
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Jan 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Jan 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William Shaw
14 Feb 2006 Author responded Author comments - Claire Glenton
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Feb 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 5
21 Feb 2006 Author responded Author comments - Claire Glenton
Resubmission - Version 6
21 Feb 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 6
9 Mar 2006 Author responded Author comments - Claire Glenton
Resubmission - Version 7
9 Mar 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
15 Mar 2006 Editorially accepted
15 Mar 2006 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-6-34

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement