Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Using quantitative and qualitative data in health services research – what happens when mixed method findings conflict? [ISRCTN61522618]

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Sep 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Oct 2005 Author responded Author comments - Suzanne Moffatt
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Oct 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Nov 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alicia O'Cathain
21 Nov 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sally Wyke
9 Dec 2005 Author responded Author comments - Suzanne Moffatt
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Dec 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Jan 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alicia O'Cathain
31 Jan 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sally Wyke
2 Mar 2006 Author responded Author comments - Suzanne Moffatt
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Mar 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
8 Mar 2006 Editorially accepted
8 Mar 2006 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-6-28

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement