Skip to main content

Table 3 Linear regression models examining associations between 'satisfaction with amount of PCP choice', choice-related variables and provider trust

From: Consumer satisfaction with primary care provider choice and associated trust

Model Model (n = 522) § Model (n = 525)
  Coeff.+ Robust SE Non-Robust SE) Coeff.+ Robust SE Non-Robust SE
Dependent Variable Provider Trust (Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale) Score
Independent Variables       
Enough PCP choice 1.872*** (0.530) (0.535) 1.885*** (0.524) (0.544)
Speak to PCP outside medical office 0.839 (0.433) (0.443) 0.126 (0.437) (0.451)
Dispute with the PCP -1.181 (0.800) (0.727) -1.752* (0.831) (0.729)
Years with the PCP 0.077 ψ (0.032) (0.031) 0.071* (0.032) (0.032)
Satisfaction with the Insurer 0.338 (0.470) (0.445) 0.161 (0.485) (0.451)
Insurer charge less if provider within network -0.132 (0.418) (0.444) -0.221 (0.436) (0.428)
PCP's care always effective 6.740*** (0.952) (0.741) 7.105*** (0.953) (0.750)
Long waiting time to appointment -0.886 (0.548) (0.566) -1.189* (0.563) (0.572)
Second opinion on PCP -6.040*** (0.932) (0.695) -6.440*** (0.940) (0.701)
Age (consumer) -0.005 (0.011) (0.010) -0.000 (0.011) (0.010)
Female (consumer) 1.124** (0.407) (0.418) 1.052** (0.409) (0.426)
Racematch 0.469 (0.447) (0.447) 0.461 (0.456) (0.453)
Education 0.569 (0.237) (0.249) 0.632** (0.240) (0.253)
Constant 31.693*** (1.470) (1.222) 31.24* (1.488) (1.239)
R-squared   0.428 0.428   0.47 0.472
Adjusted R-squared   -- 0.413   -- 0.457
  1. ***Significant at p < .001, **Significant at p< .01, *Significant at p < .035, ψSignificant at p = .017
  2. + Standardized coefficient (beta) obtained from ordinary least squares linear regression analysis.
  3. § The model omits 3 outlier observations of the dependent variable 'provider trust'.