Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The use of end-quintile comparisons to identify under-servicing of the poor and over-servicing of the rich: A longitudinal study describing the effect of socioeconomic status on healthcare

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Apr 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Jul 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gert P. Westert
5 Aug 2005 Author responded Author comments - Kate Brameld
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Aug 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Aug 2005 Author responded Author comments - Kate Brameld
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Aug 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Aug 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gert P. Westert
26 Aug 2005 Author responded Author comments - Kate Brameld
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Aug 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
2 Sep 2005 Author responded Author comments - Kate Brameld
Resubmission - Version 6
2 Sep 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
9 Sep 2005 Editorially accepted
9 Sep 2005 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-5-61

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement