Skip to main content

Table 3 Characteristics of assessed candidates

From: Intermediate care: for better or worse? Process evaluation of an intermediate care model between a university hospital and a residential home

Process parameter

Outcome

Gender

Male n = 72 (38.3%)

 

Female n = 117 (61.7%)

Age distribution

< 65 years n = 34 (18.3%)

 

65–69 years n = 21 (11.3%)

 

70–74 years n = 19 (10.2%)

 

75–79 years n = 40 (21.5%)

 

80–84 years n = 33 (17.7%)

 

> 85 years n = 39 (21.0%)

 

missing n = 3

Home situation

Living alone n = 160 (84.7%)

 

Living with a partner n = 29 (15.3%)

Medical diagnoses

Cardiovascular diseases n = 44 (23.3%)

 

Cancer n = 37 (19.4%)

 

Other n = 108 (57.3%)

Reasons for application

Recovery after surgery n = 30 (17.4%)

 

Rehabilitation n = 65 (37.8%)

 

Waiting for a nursing home n = 33 (19.2%)

 

Waiting for a residential care home n = 3 (1.8%)

 

Oncology therapy n = 10 (5.8%)

 

Other n = 31 (18.0%)

 

Missing n = 17