Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: Pilot study of a new system

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Jan 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Mar 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benjamin Djulbegovic
25 Mar 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph WATINE
30 Mar 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anja Tuulonen
9 Apr 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Bigby
24 Nov 2004 Author responded Author comments - Andy Oxman
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Nov 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Dec 2004 Author responded Author comments - Andy Oxman
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Dec 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Jan 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anja Tuulonen
15 Mar 2005 Author responded Author comments - Andy Oxman
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Mar 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Mar 2005 Author responded Author comments - Andy Oxman
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Mar 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
23 Mar 2005 Editorially accepted
23 Mar 2005 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-5-25

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement