What is important in evaluating health care quality? An international comparison of user views
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Sep 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Oct 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kevin McKee|
|8 Nov 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marilyn Oermann|
|15 Dec 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Groenewegen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Dec 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Jan 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marilyn Oermann|
|18 Jan 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kevin McKee|
|7 Feb 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Groenewegen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Feb 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|21 Feb 2005||Editorially accepted|
|21 Feb 2005||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-5-16|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.