Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The role of 'confounding by indication' in assessing the effect of quality of care on disease outcomes in general practice: results of a case-control study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Jun 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Oct 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - noel weiss
16 Dec 2004 Author responded Author comments - Johan de Koning
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Dec 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Jan 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - noel weiss
27 Jan 2005 Author responded Author comments - Johan de Koning
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Jan 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Jan 2005 Author responded Author comments - Johan de Koning
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Jan 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Jan 2005 Editorially accepted
27 Jan 2005 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-5-10

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement