Audit of head injury management in Accident and Emergency at two hospitals: implications for NICE CT guidelines
© Miller et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 12 November 2003
Accepted: 03 May 2004
Published: 03 May 2004
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Nov 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 Nov 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ian Swann|
|19 Jan 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jeff Bazarian|
|27 Jan 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bertil Romner|
|16 Mar 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Alan Tennant|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Mar 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Mar 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Alan Tennant|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Mar 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Mar 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ian Swann|
|29 Mar 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jeff Bazarian|
|22 Apr 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bertil Romner|
|29 Apr 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Alan Tennant|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|29 Apr 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|3 May 2004||Editorially accepted|
|3 May 2004||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-4-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.