Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Identification of ambiguities in the 1994 chronic fatigue syndrome research case definition and recommendations for resolution

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Apr 2003 Submitted Original manuscript
28 May 2003 Author responded Author comments - Suzanne Vernon
Resubmission - Version 2
28 May 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Jun 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susanne Merz
3 Jul 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Niloofar Afari
25 Jul 2003 Author responded Author comments - Suzanne Vernon
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Jul 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Aug 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Niloofar Afari
5 Sep 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susanne Merz
6 Oct 2003 Author responded Author comments - Suzanne Vernon
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Oct 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Dec 2003 Author responded Author comments - Suzanne Vernon
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Dec 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
31 Dec 2003 Editorially accepted
31 Dec 2003 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-3-25

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement