This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Inter-rater agreement in the scoring of abstracts submitted to a primary care research conference
© Montgomery et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2002
Received: 03 December 2001
Accepted: 26 March 2002
Published: 26 March 2002
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|3 Dec 2001||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Dec 2001||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Wager|
|15 Jan 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Susan van Rooyen|
|1 Feb 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Alan Montgomery|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|1 Feb 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Feb 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Wager|
|25 Mar 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Alan Montgomery|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Mar 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Mar 2002||Editorially accepted|
|26 Mar 2002||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-2-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.