Reporting of measures of accuracy in systematic reviews of diagnostic literature
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Sep 2001||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Nov 2001||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lucas M. Bachmann|
|19 Dec 2001||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carolyn Rutter|
|3 Jan 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Honest Honest|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Jan 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Jan 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carolyn Rutter|
|4 Mar 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Honest Honest|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|4 Mar 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|7 Mar 2002||Editorially accepted|
|7 Mar 2002||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-2-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.