From: Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: A transdisciplinary study
Publicity | Limit-setting decisions and their rationales must be publicly accessible. |
Relevance | These rationales must rest on information and principled arguments that fair-minded parties (people predisposed to working together under rules of mutual cooperation) can agree are relevant to deciding how to meet the diverse needs of a covered population under necessary resource constraints. |
Appeals | There is a mechanism for challenge and dispute resolution regarding limit-setting decisions, including the opportunity for revising decisions in light of further evidence or arguments. |
Enforcement | There is either voluntary or public regulation of the process to ensure that the first three conditions are met. |