Open Peer Review Reports for: An observational study of emergency department utilization among enrollees of Minnesota Health Care Programs: financial and non-financial barriers have different associations
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 May 2013 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 2 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Kullgren |
| 11 Oct 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Derek DeLia |
| 7 Dec 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Nathan Shippee |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 7 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 9 Dec 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Nathan Shippee |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 9 Dec 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 1 Jan 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Kullgren |
| 31 Jan 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Derek DeLia |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 4 Feb 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 8 Feb 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-62 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
