Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: An observational study of emergency department utilization among enrollees of Minnesota Health Care Programs: financial and non-financial barriers have different associations

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 May 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Jul 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Kullgren
11 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Derek DeLia
7 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nathan Shippee
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Nathan Shippee
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeffrey Kullgren
31 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Derek DeLia
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
4 Feb 2014 Editorially accepted
8 Feb 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-14-62

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement