From: Determinants of perceived quality of obstetric care in rural Tanzania: a cross-sectional study
OLS coefficient (95% CI) | |
---|---|
Fixed effects: individual-level variables (n = 761) | |
Maternal factors | |
Age | 0.01 (-0.02, 0.05) |
Any secondary education | -1.44 (-2.38, -0.51)** |
Household wealth: richest 20% | -0.23 (-0.90, 0.44) |
Listens to the radio daily | -0.99 (-1.52, -0.47)*** |
Past maternal health experiences | |
Number of ANC services receiveda | 0.46 (0.18, 0.74)** |
Had at least one newborn who died | 0.87 (-0.28, 2.02) |
Current care experience | |
Processes | |
Number of delivery services receivedb | 0.55 (0.27, 0.83)*** |
Experienced disrespect or abuse | -4.13 (-5.02, -3.24)*** |
Outcomes | |
Borrowed money or sold assets to pay for services | -0.24 (-1.02, 0.53) |
Fixed effects: health facility-level variables (n = 24) | |
Inputs/infrastructure | |
Index of equipment, supplies, and drugs availablec | -0.10 (-0.50, 0.30) |
Facility average health worker confidence on 35 maternal, newborn, and HIV skills | -0.03 (-0.05, -0.01)** |
Processes | |
Number of emergency obstetric services provided in past 3 months (max. 7)d | -0.07 (-0.36, 0.22) |
Number of postnatal services routinely provided (max. 11)e | 0.48 (0.15, 0.81)** |
Random effects (variance partitioned) | |
Individual-level plus random | 100 |
Health facility-level | 0 |