Table 2 Mixed-methods data matrix
Strand | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qualitative | Quantitative | ||||||
Themes identified | Number of times mentioned n/N (%) | Thematic variable | Representativeness n/N (%) | Influence on acceptability | Influence on readiness | ||
OR (95% CI); p | aOR (95% CI); p | OR (95% CI); p | aOR (95% CI); p | ||||
Acceptability | 61/67 (91.0) | Would adhere to an SMS support initiative | 344/420 (81.9) | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Readiness | 63/80 (78.7) | Believes community can run programme in a sustainable way | 295/420 (73.6) | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Acceptable cost | 175/210 (83.3) | Willing to pay to receive SMS | 118/417 (34.4) | 0.09 (0.01-0.68); 0.020 | 0.03 (0.00-0.29) | 0.45 (0.26-0.80); 0.006 | 0.35 (0.18-0.66); 0.002 |
Affinity to community projects | 6/96 (6.6) | Currently participates in a community support initiative | 57.2 (43.94) | 0 (0.0-0.0); 0.998 | 0 (0.0-0.0); 0.998 | 0.99 (0.41-2.40); 0.982 | 1.09 (0.41-2.97); 0.855 |
Independent management | 58/67 (86.5) | Prefers participation of health personnel | 227/417 (54.4) | 0.92 (0.56-1.56);0.751 | 0.84 (0.49-1.43); 0.841 | 1.12 (0.72-1.75); 0.613 | 1.26 (0.77-2.02); 0.344 |
Independent management | 45/67 (67.1) | Prefers project be based in hospital | 63/419 (15.0) | 0.79 (0.38-1.65); 0.543 | 0.83 (0.37-1.84); 0.648 | 1.17 (0.97-3.08); 0.060 | 1.62 (0.85-3.10); 0.142 |