Skip to main content

Table 6 Summary of results of the sensitivity analyses

From: Cost-effectiveness analysis of liraglutide versus sitagliptin or exenatide in patients with inadequately controlled Type 2 diabetes on oral antidiabetic drugs in Greece

Sensitivity analysis

Liraglutide 1.2 mg vs. sitagliptin

Liraglutide 1.8 mg vs. exenatide BID

 

Difference in QALYs

Difference in costs [€]

ICER [€ per QALY gained]

Difference in QALYs

Difference in costs [€]

ICER [€ per QALY gained]

Base case

0.19 (0.16)

2797 (1468)

15101

0.19 (0.16)

1302 (1492)

6818

Model time horizon:

      

 30 years

0.18 (0.15)

2857 (1428)

15767

0.18 (0.15)

1380 (1541)

7874

 20 years

0.12 (0.11)

2946 (1186)

23797

0.12 (0.12)

1531 (1218)

12531

 10 years

0.06 (0.06)

3569 (791)

61595

0.05 (0.06)

2306 (774)

43977

 5 years

0.04 (0.02)

3787 (452)

106618

0.03 (0.03)

2458 (516)

84503

Discount rate:

      

 0%

0.34 (0.31)

2319 (2759)

6776

0.36 (0.30)

552 (2767)

1529

 6%

0.13 (0.11)

2879 (1057)

22353

0.13 (0.11)

1529 (1081)

11754

Costs of complications:

      

 Increased by 10%

0.19 (0.16)

2694 (1605)

14541

0.19 (0.16)

1074 (1630)

5625

 Decreased by 10%

0.19 (0.16)

2902 (1323)

15666

0.19 (0.16)

1531 (1355)

8020

Physiological parameters:

      

 HbA1c 95% upper limit

0.23 (0.15)

2411 (1565)

10334

0.26 (0.16)

798 (1500)

3101

 HbA1c 95% lower limit

0.14 (0.16)

3270 (1557)

23725

0.12 (0.16)

1947 (1500)

15961

 UKPDS creep of HbA1c for 5 years

0.10 (0.15)

3362 (1597)

32756

0.10 (0.15)

1922 (1613)

18940

 SBP 95% upper limit

0.20 (0.16)

2784 (1517)

14086

0.21 (0.15)

1142 (1500)

5380

 SBP 95% lower limit

0.18 (0.15)

2897 (1468)

16246

0.19 (0.15)

1375 (1444)

7327

 Lipid 95% upper limit

0.22 (0.16)

2744 (1541)

12693

0.22 (0.15)

1162 (1605)

5373

 Lipid 95% lower limit

0.17 (0.16)

2781 (1492)

16577

0.16 (0.15)

1459 (1525)

9400

 BMI 95% upper limit

0.20 (0.15)

2810 (1500)

13823

0.20 (0.17)

1274 (1484)

6231

 BMI 95% lower limit

0.18 (0.16)

2820 (1500)

16030

0.18 (0.16)

1269 (1460)

7263

 BMI benefit maintained

0.25 (0.15)

2759 (1476)

11105

0.21 (0.16)

1312 (1492)

6408

Hypoglycaemia:

      

 No hypo disutility

0.19 (0.16)

2797 (1468)

14867

0.18 (0.16)

1302 (1492)

7272

 Disutility of −0.0052 for all hypos

0.19 (0.16)

2797 (1468)

15118

0.19 (0.16)

1302 (1492)

6699

Treatment duration:

      

 7 years

0.20 (0.15)

3941 (1428)

19773

0.20 (0.17)

2114 (1557)

10458

 3 years

0.19 (0.17)

1329 (1500)

7123

0.19 (0.16)

275 (1460)

1480

Greek cohort data

0.12 (0.14)

3008 (1775)

24355

0.12 (0.15)

1586 (1928)

13424

52 week clinical data

0.22 (0.17)

2309 (1508)

10564

   

Liraglutide delayed by 1 year

0.12 (0.16)

2340 (1581)

19960

-

-

-

Liraglutide 1.2 mg cost &:

      

 100% of 1.8 mg efficacy

-

-

-

0.19 (0.16)

−1473 (1492)

Lira. Dominant

 90% of 1.8 mg efficacy

-

-

-

0.14 (0.15)

−1016 (1500)

Lira. Dominant

 80% of 1.8 mg efficacy

-

-

-

0.08 (0.15)

−625 (1613)

Lira. Dominant

 70% of 1.8 mg efficacy

-

-

-

0.02 (0.15)

−126 (1525)

Lira. Dominant

  1. Data are mean (SD). QALY = quality-adjusted life year; € = 2013 Euros; ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; HbA1c = glycated haemoglobin; UKPDS = United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study; SBP = systolic blood pressure; BMI = body mass index; Hypo = hypoglycaemic event; Lira = Liraglutide.