Table 4 Participant opinions of the workshops
From: Assessing the validity of prospective hazard analysis methods: a comparison of two techniques
Questions | HFMEA | SWIFT |
|---|---|---|
In your opinion did the workshop identify the most serious hazards in the care of patients? | Yes 4 | Yes 5 |
No 1 | No 0 | |
Did the workshop identify realistic hazards? That is, things that realistically might go wrong? | Yes 5 | Yes 5 |
No 0 | No 0 | |
Did the workshop identify new hazards that you were not aware of before? | Yes 4 | Yes 5 |
No 1 | No 0 | |
Has the workshop changed your understanding of the risks in your work? | Yes 4 | Yes 1 |
No 1 | No 4 | |
Was the process easy to understand? | Yes 5 | Yes 5 |
No 0 | No 0 | |
Did everyone contribute to the discussion? | Yes 5 | Yes 5 |
No 0 | No 0 | |
What were the main benefits of the workshop? (free text; multiple answers possible) | • Identified hazards (4) | • Discussion (2) |
• Identified actions (1) | • Increased understanding of the clinic (1) | |
• Increased awareness of risks (1) | • Forum for reflection (1) | |
• Increased understanding of the clinic (1) | ||
• Systematic (1) | ||
What were the main limitations of the workshop? (free text; multiple answers possible) | • Lack of time (5) | • Lack of time (4) |
• Session was long (1) | ||
• Dry (1) |