Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Assessing the validity of prospective hazard analysis methods: a comparison of two techniques

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Apr 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
28 May 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Dieckmann
13 Jun 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bryony Dean Franklin
6 Aug 2013 Author responded Author comments - Henry Potts
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Aug 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bryony Dean Franklin
9 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Dieckmann
6 Nov 2013 Author responded Author comments - Henry Potts
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Nov 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bryony Dean Franklin
11 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Dieckmann
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
23 Jan 2014 Editorially accepted
27 Jan 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-14-41

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement